A systematic analysis of the anticancer activities of medicinal plant extracts in triple-negative breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cells
Lahye Yun | Korea International School, Jeju Campus
YeJin Ahn | Saint Johnsbury Academy Jeju
Korea International School, Jeju Campus (KISJ) G11
I want to pursue biology and continue developing innovative solutions to real-world health and environmental problems.
St. Johnsbury Academy Jeju (SJA), Grade 11
Later, I hope to attend medical school and become a doctor, where I can continue exploring my interest in health, especially women's health.
We are a female-led research team from Jeju. We are 11th graders, Lahye Yun and Yejin Ahn, and we conduct research using a variety of plant resources that grow on Jeju Island.
While we were continuously conducting research using Jeju plant resources, we witnessed a close friend's mother struggle with the side effects of radiation therapy. That experience led us to ask, "Is there a safer therapeutic candidate?"
Using MDA-MB-231 cells, we aimed to explore biocompatible, plant-based therapeutic candidates from domestic plants that could complement the limitations of radiation therapy.
Triple-negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors. Because these key receptors are absent, this does not respond to targeted or hormone-based treatments and is considered the most difficult form of breast cancer to treat.
In this study, we used the MDA-MB-231 cell line, which represents triple-negative breast cancer, an aggressive form that accounts for about 15-20% of cases.
Treatment for triple-negative breast cancer mainly relies on chemotherapy and radiation therapy due to the limited effectiveness of targeted therapy. However, commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs cause serious side effects.
Induces nephrotoxicity, along with damaging both cancer cells and normal cells.
Significant side effects affecting overall patient quality of life and immune function.
Hypochaeris radicata
Artemisia capillaris
Viscum coloratum
Euphorbia maculata
Tetragonia tetragonioides
Current applications of plant-derived compounds in cancer treatment highlight their significant therapeutic potential. Their lower toxicity and established safety profiles highlight the need for effective plant-derived treatments for triple-negative breast cancer.
Collect plants from Jeju Island
Grind into fine powder
Ultrasound-assisted extraction
Filtration, concentration, freeze-drying
Confirm cytotoxicity and cell proliferation inhibitory effects
Evaluate cell migration inhibition
Long-term proliferation assessment
Flow cytometry-based analysis
mRNA and protein expression analysis
Primary Targets:
Before using the extracts in our experiments, we first needed to confirm cytotoxicity.
We found that Hypochaeris and Tetragonia showed little cytotoxicity (overall), whereas Viscum, Artemisia, and Euphorbia showed cytotoxic effects at higher concentrations.
For the wound-healing assay, we cultured the cells in 6-well plates, created a scratch using a pipette tip, and then treated the cells with each extract.
In the control group, the wound area decreased over time. In contrast, when the extracts were applied, the wound area remained largely unchanged, indicating that cell migration and proliferation were inhibited.
In the long-term culture (colony formation) assay, we observed that all extracts clearly suppressed the ability of MDA-MB-231 cells to form colonies.
These results indicate that each extract has a strong antiproliferative effect, inhibiting the cells' ability to divide and maintain colonies in a concentration-dependent manner.
Western blot analysis supported the qPCR results at the protein level.
Western blot analysis supported these results. Hypochaeris reduced p65 and pSTAT3 expression, while Artemisia decreased c-Myc levels. Viscum showed a dual cell death-inducing pattern, with reduced p65 expression and activation of the RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL pathway, indicating involvement of multiple cell death mechanisms.
Evaluation of cytotoxicity across all plant extracts.
Evaluation of cytotoxicity revealed that Tetragonia tetragonoides and Hypochaeris radicata exhibited minimal toxicity even at high concentrations, while other extracts demonstrated dose-dependent effects, highlighting the importance of optimizing concentration ranges for safe therapeutic use.
Because each experiment used different treatment concentrations, we cannot directly compare anticancer potency across plants under a standardized condition. Instead, we focused on whether each extract exhibited anticancer effects in MDA-MB-231 cells and on the mechanisms underlying those effects.
Most Promising Candidates
Tetragonia, Artemisia, and Hypochaeris show the greatest potential, given their bioactive compounds as well as their environmental and economic advantages. However, Viscum and Euphorbia should still be retained as potential candidates for further research.
For next steps, we will identify active compounds using HPLC and LC-MS analyses to pinpoint the specific molecules driving the observed anticancer effects.
Isolate and test individual fractions through MPLC to determine which specific components or synergistic combinations are responsible for the results.
While not feasible at this stage, we plan to pursue in vivo validation in future university research, with the goal of ultimately developing a viable therapeutic product.